Comstock Act: How Censorship Shaped Sex, Speech, and Sexual Rights in America

When the Comstock Act, a federal law passed in 1873 that criminalized the mailing of anything deemed "obscene," including contraception, abortion info, and sex education materials. Also known as the Act for the Suppression of Trade in, and Circulation of, Obscene Literature and Articles of Immoral Use, it didn’t just ban mail—it banned knowledge. This wasn’t about protecting morals. It was about control. Anthony Comstock, a self-appointed moral crusader with federal backing, turned the U.S. Postal Service into a tool of sexual repression. He didn’t just target porn. He targeted birth control pamphlets, sex advice books, even medical textbooks that mentioned the clitoris. Women who wanted to plan their families were labeled immoral. Doctors who gave advice were arrested. And for decades, the law made silence the only safe option.

The Victorian morality, a rigid social code that equated female purity with national virtue and treated sex as a dirty secret, even within marriage. Also known as the cult of domesticity, it was the fuel behind the Comstock Act. This wasn’t just about religion—it was about power. Men controlled women’s bodies by controlling what they could read, say, or even feel. The law didn’t just punish sellers—it punished curiosity. It made women ashamed to ask questions about their own bodies. It delayed medical progress. It kept abortion illegal, even when it was the only option for women in desperate situations. And it didn’t just affect adults. Schools couldn’t teach basic anatomy. Libraries removed books. Even the word "contraception" became a crime. The obscenity laws, a legal framework built on vague, subjective standards that gave authorities power to decide what was "indecent" based on personal bias. Also known as moral censorship statutes, they turned the Comstock Act into a living, breathing machine of suppression lasted well into the 20th century. It took decades of activism, court cases, and changing social norms to chip away at it. Even then, its shadow stayed. When states started banning abortion pills in the 2020s, they used the same language. When schools removed sex ed curriculums, they cited "obscenity." The Comstock Act didn’t die—it evolved.

What you’ll find here isn’t just history. It’s the chain reaction. The stories of women silenced, doctors punished, and movements that fought back. You’ll read about how the AMA’s 1950s sex education program quietly defied Comstock’s legacy. You’ll see how the fight for reproductive rights in Roe v. Wade was really a fight against the last gasps of this law. You’ll learn how the same moral panic that banned condoms once tried to erase lesbian history, censor erotic poetry, and criminalize masturbation. These aren’t separate issues. They’re all connected by the same fear: that if people knew the truth about sex, they’d take back control. And that’s exactly why the Comstock Act was so dangerous. It didn’t just ban things. It made people believe they should be ashamed to want them.

The Legal Legacy of the Comstock Act: How a 19th-Century Law Still Threatens Access to Contraception and Abortion Mail

The Legal Legacy of the Comstock Act: How a 19th-Century Law Still Threatens Access to Contraception and Abortion Mail

Jan 19 2026 / History & Culture

The Comstock Act of 1873 banned mailing contraceptives and abortion information. Now, over 150 years later, it’s being revived as a tool to restrict abortion access nationwide-even in states where it’s legal. This is how a 19th-century censorship law became a modern threat to reproductive care.

VIEW MORE
The Hicklin Test: How Courts Once Defined Obscenity

The Hicklin Test: How Courts Once Defined Obscenity

Dec 5 2025 / History & Culture

The Hicklin Test was a 19th-century legal standard that banned any material deemed potentially corrupting to vulnerable readers. It led to the censorship of literature, medical texts, and art for over 60 years in the U.S. until it was overturned in 1957.

VIEW MORE